Nice to kill you, to kill you Nice


Healthcare to be delivered universally according to patient need rather than who they are or their lifestyle choice or what they have done or the size of their wallet is a principle under constant attack of late. What with this and an ever growing well-funded campaign for ‘euthanasia,’ (something a younger me would not have questioned) and we really do see the ruling classes eugenic filled dreams of sterilising the weak, old and disabled out in the open. Whereas these kind of sinister initiatives should be met with virulent opposition from NHS workers and society at large we see them slyly pushed through with next to no professional consultation and zero public backing. In a supposedly free country murderous dictators must be looking at our administration and thinking ‘hey, there’s an easier way to curtail the population, lessen my expenditure or subdue dissent than firing squads, my oh my it must be nice to be NICE.’ Ian Johnston reports: “New drugs will only be made available on the NHS if they help people deemed to be a benefit to society under proposals that prompted fears elderly people could be denied treatment.

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice) is due to change how it decides which drugs can be provided by the health service.

The proposals would mean Nice would have to consider “wider societal benefits” of the treatments as well as the cost and benefits to patients.

Dr Paul Catchpole, of the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry, told The Daily Telegraph: “It is concerning because, under the new appraisal system, cancer medicine might do less well because older people aren’t as beneficial to society.

“You might have a cancer treatment for a severe disease but because the majority of the cancer patients are elderly they aren’t generating wider societal benefits, they are more likely to be generating costs.

“But if you have got a medicine that gets someone back to work then you could argue, under this system, that that’s better for society.”

David Taylor, professor of pharmaceutical and public health policy at University College London, said the plan was “a real threat to the public well-being and a real threat to the well-being of older people”.

“To me the whole methodology seems deeply suspect,” he said.

Sources close to Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt told The Telegraph that plan was at an early stage and would not result in discrimination against elderly people.

The draft policy is due to be put out for public consultation in the next few weeks.” (

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.